U.S. 16-273 Case History

Gloucester County School Board, Petitioner v. G. G., By His Next Friend and Mother, Deirdre Grimm
No. 16-273, Docket 

Court: United States Supreme Court 
Docketed: September 1, 2016
Lower Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 15-2056
Decision Date: April 19, 2016Rehearing Denied: May 31, 2016

Associated Cases (Case Files under construction):
G. G. v. Gloucester County School Board (4th Cir.), No. 15-2056, Docket
G. G. v. Gloucester County School Board (E.D. Va.), No. 4:15-cv-00054, Docket
G. G. v. Gloucester County School Board (4th Cir.), No. 16-1733, Docket

Summary Disposition (03/06/2017)
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of the guidance document issued by the Department of Education and Department of Justice on February 22, 2017. 

 

BRIEFS ON THE MERITS
Advisory letter from the Solicitor General  
  • Letter  with attachment from U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. (02/22/2017)
  • Request from the Clerk that the parties submit their views on how this case should proceed in light of the guidance document issued by the Department of Education and Department of Justice on February 22, 2017.  (see docket, 02/23/2017)
  • Letter of petitioner per Clerk request (03/01/2017)
  • Letter of respondent per Clerk request (03/01/2017)
Amicus Briefs in support of Petitioner 
Amicus Briefs in support of neither party
Amicus Briefs in support of Respondent
ORAL ARGUMENT

 

CERT PETITION and RESPONSES
  • Petition for a writ of certiorari (08/29/2016)
  • Brief in opposition by G.G. (09/13/2016)
  • Reply of petitioner Gloucester County School Board (09/26/2016)
  • DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 14, 2016 (09/28/2016)
  • DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 28, 2016 (10/24/2016)
  • ORDER Cert Granted (10/28/2016)
    • Limited to these two questions:
      • 2. If Auer is retained, should deference extend to an unpublished agency letter that, among other things, does not carry the force of law and was adopted in the context of the very dispute in which deference is sought?
      • 3. With or without deference to the agency, should the Department’s specific interpretation of Title IX and 34 C.F.R. § 106.33 be given effect?
AMICUS BRIEFS
In Support of Granting Cert

 

INITIAL PROCEEDINGS (Prior to Cert Petition)

Last updated 01/10/2017