D. Mass. 3:12-cv-30051 Case History

Sexual Minorities Uganda v. Lively
No. 3:12-cv-30051, Docket 

Court: District of Massachusetts
Assigned to: Judge Michael A. Ponsor
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson
(Previously Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman)

Associated Cases:
In re: Lively, No. 13-2503, Docket (1st Cir.) [under construction]

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

COMPLAINT and ANSWERS

• Complaint (03/14/2012)
• Amended Complaint (07/13/2012)

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Pending)

• Scott Lively’s Motion for Summary Judgment (07/05/2015 )
  • In Support of Motion
  • Memo (07/06/2016, following approval of oversize brief)
  • Notice of Filing Deposition Transcripts
  • Notice of Filing Deposition Exhibits
  • Notice of Filing Digital Media (CD filed with Court)
  • Second Notice of Filing Deposition Exhibit  (previous filing erroneously marked “confidential”)
  • Supplement to Memo-Exhibit E (07/25/2016)

• Sexual Minorities Uganda’s (“SMUG”) Memorandum in Opposition to Motion (08/08/2016) #292
  • Declarations in Opposition
    • Mark S. Sullivan
    • Patricia Ackerman
    • Diane Bakuraira
    • Brian Nkoyooyo
    • Claire Byarugaba
    • Chris Dolan
    • Samuel Ganafa
    • Adrian Jjuuko
    • Gaetano Kagwa
    • Kapya Kaoma
    • Richard Lusimbo
    • Frank Mugisha
    • Jackson Mukasa
    • Kim Mukisa
    • Jay Mulucha
    • Brian Nkoyooyo
    • Sandra Ntebi
    • Katherine Roubos
    • Warry Ssenfuka
    • Sylvia Tamale
    • Witness X  (Filed Under Seal)
    • Pepe Onziema
  • SMUG’s (1) Response to Lively’s Statement of Facts and (2) Concise Statement of Material Facts of Record Omitted By Lively
    • Declaration of Pamela C. Spees containing additional previously omitted exhibits (10/27/2016)
    • See  SMUG Motion to file omitted exhibits and Declaration in Support of motion (10/25/2016) 
      • Lively’s Opposition to motion to file (10/26/2016) 
      • ORDER – Granting motion to file (10/27/2016)

• Lively’s Reply in Support of Motion (09/01/2016)
  • Declaration of Roger K. Gannam in support

• SMUG’s Sur-Reply in Opposition to Motion (09/15/2016)
  • See SMUG’s Motion to file Sur-Reply (09/09/2016)
    • Lively’s Opposition to Sur-Reply (09/14/2016)
    • Electronic Order – Granting motion to file (09/15/2016)

• Hearing on Motion held November 9, 2016; Electronic Clerk’s Notes; TRANSCRIPT
  • • Hampden Courtroom
      300 State Street, Hampden Courtroom
      Springfield, Massachusetts 01105
  • Order Regarding Oral Argument (11/07/2016)
    • 1. Each party will have half an hour for an initial presentation. Each will then have fifteen minutes to reply.
    • 2. Oral argument will focus on two questions. First, what actions does Plaintiff say were taken by Defendant in the United States that had a direct, causal link to injury suffered by Plaintiff or its members in Uganda? Second, what specific speech or conduct by Defendant –- however odious, in Plaintiff’s view –- fell outside the protection of the First Amendment?

MOTION TO DISMISS STATE LAW CLAIMS

• Lively’s Motion and Memo in Support to Dismiss State Law Claims (03/31/2017)

Current through Docket # xx, 08/xx/2016