9th Cir. 18-35708 Case History

Parents for Privacy v. Barr
(previously Parents for Privacy v. Sessions)
No. 18-35708, Docket

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Panel: Circuit Judges A. Wallace Tashima, Susan P. Graber, and John B. Owens

Appealed from :

• Parents for Privacy v. Sessions (D. Ore., No. 3:17-cv-01813)
  • Opinion and Order and Final Judgment (07/24/2108)
    • Case Dismissed
  • Notice of Appeal (08/21/2018)

ORAL ARGUMENT

• Oral Argument held  Thursday, July 11, 2019 VIDEO
  Before Judges Tashima, Graber, and Owens
  • Arguing for Plaintiffs-Appellants Parents for Privacy, et al. (20 min): James Ryan Adams, Tyler Smith & Associates
  • Arguing for Defendants-Appellees
    • Federal Defendants (5 min): Dennis Fan, U.S. Department of Justice
    • Intervenor Basic Rights Oregon (7 min): Gabriel Arkles, ACLU
    • Dallas School District No. 2 (8 min): Blake H. Fry, Mersereau Shannon, LLP

BRIEFS ON THE MERITS

• Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Opening Brief and Excerpt of Record (11/29/2018)
• Answering Briefs (03/04/2019)
  • Federal Defendants-Appellees
  • Dallas School District No. 2
  • Intervenor-Appellee Basic Rights Oregon and Supplemental Record
• Appellants’ Reply Brief  (03/25/2019)

Amicus Briefs in support of Defendant-Appellees and in favor of affirmance

• Transgender Students and Allies
• National Women’s Law Center
• National PTA, GLSEN, American School Counselor Association, and National Association of School Psychologists
• American Academy of Pediatrics, et al.
• Anti-Defamation League, et al.
• PFLAG, et al.
• National Education Association
• State of Oregon and Oregon Department of Education 0
• School Administrators from Thirty States and the District of Columbia

Citations of Additional Authority

• Basic Rights Oregon (06/04/2019)
  • Doe v. Boyertown Area School District (Supreme Court cert denied)
• Basic Rights Oregon (06/21/2019)
  • Karnoski v. Trump 

CASE MANAGEMENT

• Case Docketed August 21, 2018
  • Opening brief due November 29, 2018
  • Appellees Answering brief due December 31, 2018
  • Optional reply brief due 21 days after service of the answering brief
• Federal Defendants’ motion to stay briefing in light of lapse of appropriations (01/08/2019); Granted
• Federal Defendants’ motion to lift stay (01/30/2019); Granted
  • Answering briefs due March 4, 2019
  • Optional reply brief due 21 days after service of the answering brief

Current through Docket # 98, 10/09/2019